They're not inaccurate persay, the methods used to determine origin of DNA are not what people expect, it is not country based, it is regional norms for DNA. Ex. folks that think they're 100% scottish may have some scandinavian DNA, why? Vikings settled in parts of scotland. So yes, they're DNA is consistent with folks of irish decent, but also wold share dna from denmark and sweden, even if they have roots going back 1000 years in scotland. The recent compison with the id twins in the news was hyperbolic, the differences were minute and within typically error, it's isn't a CSI lab.From what I understand, those tests are pretty much inaccurate. I don't think I would give them my money.
I heard the templars and Illuminati are also involved, possibly BCWF too.IIRC the Mormon Church is the main push behind all this and that the Mormons have the largest data base on genealogy records .
They would by the last place I would be spending my hard earned $$$$.
I heard the templars and Illuminati are also involved, possibly BCWF too.
So does that explain were Justin Trudeau gene's came from ?And let us never forget our old buddies that really liked our women. "Recent findings revealed that Neanderthals interbred with ancestors of modern humans when modern humans began spreading out of Africa perhaps about 40,000 to 80,000 years ago, although some research suggests the migration began earlier. About 1.5 to 2.1 percent of the DNA of anyone outside Africa is Neanderthal in origin."
Point of interest Neanderthal existed for about 450,000 years before we came into existence and went extinct about the same time they met our women.
Actually - they are inaccurate. small winkThey're not inaccurate persay, the methods used to determine origin of DNA are not what people expect, it is not country based, it is regional norms for DNA.
Thanks, I have to leave for work in a few minutes or I would type more. From much of what I have read about the DNA tests many times FN blood lines do not show up. I am 1/4 Danish, 1/4 FN and the rest is from the UK. As an Uncle once told me when the Mayflower landed we had relitives on the ship and on shore.Exactly!
We are all Canadians.... well,, maybe except for Gunseller, but he's a Canadian wannabe!
DNA is NOT BS it is a very useful tool however there is a huge difference between the DNA ancestry tests and the ones used by law enforcement. To compare the 2 is like comparing a Savage and a Purdey.Well it's good to know that DNA is primarily BS, probably should change the law back to eyeball witnesses and hearsay only, seems to be more accurate
Hmmm...I'm 100% northern european, over half dutch/german, then english/irish, followed by scandinavian. It made sense based on my family heritage.